Niacin, or vitamin B3, is too
dangerous and should not be used routinely by people looking to control their
cholesterol levels or prevent heart disease, doctors say.
The warning comes following
recent evidence showing the vitamin does not reduce heart attacks or strokes,
and instead is linked to an increased risk of bleeding, diabetes and death.
Niacin has long been used to
increase people's levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or the
"good" cholesterol, and has been a major focus of research into heart
disease prevention for several decades. However, clinical trials have not shown
that taking niacin in any form actually prevents heart problems. Considering
the alarming side effects of niacin, researchers now say the vitamin shouldn't
even be prescribed anymore.
"There might be one
excess death for every 200 people we put on niacin," said Dr. Donald
Lloyd-Jones, a cardiologist and chair of preventive medicine at Northwestern
University Feinberg School of Medicine. "With that kind of signal, this is
an unacceptable therapy for the vast majority of patients." [8 Tips for
Healthy Aging]
The latest and largest study
of niacin, which included more than 25,000 people with heart disease, was published July
16 in The New England Journal of Medicine. The researchers found that using
long-acting niacin to raise the HDL cholesterol level did not result in
reducing heart attacks, strokes or deaths. The results were presented prior to
publication last year, after which the manufacturer of the niacin medication
used in the study, Merck & Co., said it would stop selling the drug.
The study also found some
unexpected and serious side effects. People who took niacin were more likely
than people taking a placebo to experience liver problems, infections and bleeding
in various body areas including the stomach, intestines and brain.
Niacin was also linked with
more hospitalizations among diabetic patients and the development of diabetes
in people who didn't have it at the beginning of the study.
The Merck drug was a
combination of niacin and laropiprant, a drug that prevents the facial flushing
that can be caused by high doses of niacin. However, the study researchers said
the side effects were consistent with the problems seen in previous studies of
Niacin alone, and that the new findings "are likely to be generalizable to
all high-dose niacin formulations."
"That particular
medication is not being sold anymore, but the issue is that there's still an
awful lot of niacin prescriptions being given to patients, whether that's plain
niacin or extended-release niacin," Lloyd-Jones told Live Science.
"When you look at the
totality of the data, particularly with this largest and the most recent trial,
it suggests that it's actually niacin itself that's the problem, and not this
specific niacin-laropiprant combination," said Lloyd-Jones, who wasn't
involved with the new study.
The popular rise of niacin
Prescriptions for niacin have jumped
in recent years, tripling over just eight years to reach 700,000 prescriptions
monthly in the United States by the end of 2009, researchers have found. Of all
niacin prescriptions written in 2009, 80 percent were for Niaspan, a
slow-releasing niacin tablet made by Abbott Laboratories, according to a study
published last year.
However, the rate of niacin
prescriptions may have decreased after the results of several studies were
released, Lloyd-Jones said.
Niacin can also be bought
over the counter as a supplement. These supplements may have their own issues
because vitamin products are not regulated in the same way that pharmaceutical
products are. "It may come with other things in the preparation
that we don't know about, and could potentially enhance the toxicity of
niacin," Lloyd-Jones said. "Because it is available over the counter,
I think it's important for consumers to understand that this signal appears to
apply to all types of niacin."
The available evidence
suggests that having higher levels of good cholesterol is only a sign of
lower risk for heart problems, and trying to artificially raise levels of the
good cholesterol doesn't appear to translate into lowering a person's risk of
heart problems.
"HDL is a nice marker —
if it's higher, you tend to be at lower risk. So if you could manipulate that
with healthy lifestyle and physical activity, that's undoubtedly a good thing
to do, but we haven't found a drug that will raise HDL in isolation and provide
benefit in terms of lower risks," Lloyd-Jones said.
A healthy lifestyle is the
first recommendation for lowering LDL, or the "bad" cholesterol, and
reducing the risk of heart disease. For people who are not successful in
controlling their cholesterol levels by changing their lifestyle, doctors may prescribe
statins, which remain the best choice to reduce heart attack and stroke risk,
Lloyd-Jones said.
Niacin should only be
considered for patients at very high risk for a heart attack and stroke who
can't take statins, and for whom there are no other evidence-based options,
Lloyd-Jones said.
No comments:
Post a Comment